EDIM510+RUBRICS

REFLECTION PAPER RUBRIC || ** Exemplary (A) ** || ** Adequate (B) ** || ** Needs Work (C) ** || Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs, use of subheadings, and information is factual and correct.
 * == Organization == ||

|| Information is organized but paragraphs are not well constructed. Information appears factual || The information appears to disorganized and is suspect to being correct and factual || Information clearly relates to the main topic. Paper includes several supporting details and/or examples || Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples or given || Information has little to do with the main topic || No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors || A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors || Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors || All sources are accurately documented in the desired format (APA) || All sources are accurately documented, but many are not all are in the desired format (APA)
 * Quality of Information ** ||
 * Quality of Information ** ||
 * Mechanics ** ||
 * Mechanics ** ||
 * Sources ** ||
 * Sources ** ||

|| Sources are not accurately documented  || Adapted from: http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec532_saba/downloads/reflection_rubric.doc

|| Ideas clearly relate to and expand on the subject matter. Comprehensive post displaying excellent use of language. || Post shows an adequate relation to the subject matter. Good use of language and proper structure. || Does not clearly relate to the subject. Little reflective comment development. Poor use of language. || Thoughts are complete and stated clearly. Thoughts clearly show superlative abstract thought. || Adequate expression of ideas. Good use of abstract thought. || Poorly expressed ideas. Comments express little thought process. || Excellent reply. Clearly connects to posts and superbly examines them while replying in a cohesive, intellectual and helpful way. || Good, reflective contribution. Understands peer/colleague posts and connects to them adequately. || Brief reply. Little substance to reply commentary. || Adapted from: []
 * FORUM/BLOG/SOCIAL NETWORKING POSTING RUBRIC **
 * Exemplary (A) ** ||
 * Adequate (B) ** ||
 * Needs Work (C) ** ||
 * Depth of post ** ||
 * Depth of post ** ||
 * Expression of thoughts ** ||
 * Expression of thoughts ** ||
 * Scope of reply ** ||
 * Scope of reply ** ||